Webamplitude and extent of the words “professional misconduct” in Section 35 of the Advocates Act13. The facts of the case involved an advocate (appearing as a litigant in the capacity of the respondent, and not an advocate in a rent control proceeding) assaulted and kicked the complainant and asked him to refrain from proceeding with the case WebUnder sub-section (3) of section 35 of the Advocates Act, there is a mandate for the disciplinary committee of a State Bar Council giving notice to the Advocate General and opportunity of being heard before making an order under the said sub-section.

Advocates Act, 1961- Chapter V- Conduct Of Advocates

Web9 Jul 2009 · Sec. 35 of the Advocates Act and proceeded as if mere allegations made by its two members of hear-say was sufficient for it to act. We are compelled to hold that the resolution ...Committee the Bar Council exceeded its jurisdiction and power conferred by section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. We have... State Of Rajasthan v. Jaswant Singh … Web25 May 2024 · Section 35 of the Advocates Act of 1961 deals with the disciplinary powers of the State Bar Councils and the punishment of advocates for misconduct. Section 35 [2] … putkitiikerit oy

Advocates Act, 1961 - iPleaders

Web(a) that a person may act as an independent mental capacity advocate only in such circumstances, or only subject to such conditions, as may be prescribed; (b) for the … Web28 Oct 2024 · Section 35 of the Advocates Act empowers the Bar Council to initiate disciplinary proceedings if it has reasons to believe that an advocate is guilty of … Web35. Punishment of advocates for misconduct. (1) Where on receipt of a complaint or otherwise a State Bar Council has reason to believe that any advocate its roll has been … putkitulppa